R. v. R.W. (ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE, OSHAWA — 150 BOND ST E)
Allegations: Over 80, Impaired Driving Causing Property Damage
Defence: Retained a toxicologist who provided evidence supporting the bolus drinking defence — demonstrating that, based on the client’s alcohol consumption pattern immediately prior to driving, the client’s BAC at the time of actual operation of the vehicle was below the legal limit of 80 mg per 100 mL of blood, notwithstanding the elevated breath reading obtained at the police station approximately 90 minutes later.
Result: Crown reduced all charges to Careless Driving under the Highway Traffic Act. No criminal conviction. No criminal record.